Pokemon Silver Shiny Pokemon

Two Statements Unit Atlantic (1954 and 1962).

After reviewing the Paris Declaration [1], a kind of proto-Transatlantic Declaration, we are now interested in two Declarations of Unit Atlantic 1954 and 1962. These two documents were intended to strengthen the Organization's North Atlantic Treaty (NATO) in the context of the Cold War. If the existence of an opposition, ie socialist, were a boon for the Atlanta, paradoxically, after the fall of Eastern bloc and the dissolution of the Warsaw Pact that links to Euro-Atlantic intensified. These texts must still be known to inform Euro-American relations of our time.

The Declaration of Atlantic Unity, 1954.

In its issue of October 1954, the Federal Union review Inc.. , Freedom & Union , reports the contents of the Declaration of Atlantic Unity ( "Declaration on Atlantic Unity ):

" in order to alert their compatriots and their Governments on the need to strengthen NATO, more than 150 distinguished citizens from eight nations of the Atlantic Pact, adopted a "Declaration of Atlantic Unity". Released on the eve of the meeting of the Atlantic Council Northern mid-October, the Declaration points out that NATO is still "just a military alliance" while it should be a more comprehensive alliance according to its original principles. The declaration urges the leaders of Nato:

1. Expand NATO in an effort to realign the political strategies, commercial and military member nations;

2. Establishing a major program mutual to lower tariff barriers, free cash flows and eliminate trade restrictions with the aim of establishing "a base economically viable for the Atlantic Community and its allies "

3. Through the legislature of each member country set up a committee member of NATO for educational purposes;

4. Creating a Consultative Assembly of the Atlantic represented by legislators of the member nations. It would meet regularly to discuss issues of common interest;

5. Establish an Advisory Economic Committee comprised of employers and employees to inform institutions NATO effects of their policies on the living standards of the countries of the alliance.

The statement ends with a request to "citizens to make these recommendations to our respective governments to ensure that this positive experience but more difficult (NATO) succeed." ".

Freedom & Union concluded by giving a partial list of signatories of the declaration. These are academics, business leaders, politicians, diplomats, financiers, men legislation, etc.. Eminent personalities have signed the Declaration of Atlantic Unity, including:

-American side: Vannemar Bush, president of the Carnegie Institution of Washington, William L. Clayton, former Deputy Secretary of State for Economic Affairs and co-founder of the Atlantic Union Committee (AUC), General William Donovan, former chairman of the Office of Strategic Services (OSS) officer of the American Committee on United Europe (ACUE), General William H. Draper Jr., former permanent representative of the United States Council North Atlantic; Henry Ford II, chairman of Ford Motor Company , General George Marshall, former Secretary of State, John J. McCloy, chairman of the Chase National Bank , Philip D. Reed, president of General Electric Company, Owen J. Roberts, a former member of the Supreme Court of the United States and founder of the AUC, Elmo Roper, founder of the AUC, Clarence K. Streit, Union Now author and cofounder of the AUC, Harry S. Truman, former President of the United States.

-British side: John Bailes, chairman of the World Council of Churches ; Frank Byers Former Liberal party president; Lionel Curtis, author of Commonwealth of God and Fellow of All Souls College, University of Oxford, Lord Malcolm Douglas Hamilton, vice president of Union Federal Ltd., Julian S. Huxley, biologist and writer, director general of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), Bertrand Russell, mathematician and philosopher.

-Side French: Maurice Allais, Professor of Economics at the Ecole Nationale Superieure des Mines de Paris, Michel Debre, Senator ; Giscard d'Estaing, President of the French section of the International Chamber of Commerce; Edouard Herriot, honorary president of the National Assembly, former Prime Minister; Firmin Roz, writer, member of the Institute of France.

Other prominent Canadian, Belgian, Norwegian, Danish and German have signed this document. Many of them reoffend six years later, with the second Declaration of Atlantic Unity.

The Declaration of Atlantic Unity, 1962.

Initialed by 242 NATO leaders November 12, 1962 in Paris, the new Declaration of Atlantic Unity part in an international context than tense. Indeed, a few days ago, the Cuban missile crisis has plunged the world in fear of a third world war of the nuclear type. The disaster was averted, however thanks to a clever and firm Kennedy, Khrushchev and a conciliatory and reasonable. The crisis resulted to persuade Atlanticist strengthen NATO and transatlantic ties. Thus, the second Declaration of Atlantic Unity provides a list of seven steps to create a solid union from NATO.

The 242 signatories come from 14 countries of the Atlantic alliance. Among them, 42 have held positions within their governments, 11 are former prime ministers, 84 are members of their national parliament, including six presidents and speakers. The other signatories are leading publishers, journalists, business leaders, union leaders, university presidents and professors. The signatories of the first Declaration have also played a prominent in the creation of the Parliamentary Conference NATO in 1955, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) in 1960-61 from the Atlantic Institute for International Affairs and the Atlantic Exploratory Convention in January 1962.

Here is the text of the Second Declaration of Atlantic Unity:

"WE THE UNDERSIGNED CITIZENS Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Iceland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway, Turkey, Great Britain and the United States, address this APPEAL UNIT ATLANTIC our countrymen and our governments.

We believe: That

individual sovereignty and freedom under the law are the most precious legacies of mankind.

That bastion of human freedom is the Atlantic Community.

What is this bastion facing serious threats.

that only through our unity can we preserve the freedoms we enjoy, and that our example will be followed by all humanity. International Communism believes in unity by force, our goal is a monolithic tyranny and is determined to destroy us. The threat it poses to freedom is not only military but also political, ideological, and economic. This is not just a problem confined to Europe or the West, but a global problem. We must be united so that our policies are useful on all fronts and in all sectors.

For these reasons, we mutually pledge to support one another, such loyal friends who share a common spiritual and cultural heritage [...]. We dedicate our efforts to develop our alliance into a genuine Atlantic Community to ensure the sustainability of these concepts. We urge our governments to undertake without delay the implementation of these measures to establish a true Atlantic Community, whose first five have been unanimously recommended by the Convention of Atlantic nations of NATO in Paris in January 1962.

1. Establish a government commission on the Atlantic Unit will prepare a Charter for Community Atlantic properly organized to meet the challenges of our time.

2. Create a permanent High Council will intervene in cases defined by a weighted majority voting on issues of common interest.

3. Expand Parliamentary Conference of NATO in the framework of a consultative assembly to enable it to review the work of all institutions Atlanticist, and make recommendations.

4. Establish a commercial partnership between the EEC and North America, stand for Atlantic Economic Community, but open to all other nations of the free world.

5. Establish a High Court of Justice of the Atlantic to solve problems that may occur in the treaties.

6. Promote measures to ensure a more effective defense, including developing a Unified Command Atlantic, a common strategy within and outside the Atlantic region, greater standardization and a more rational production of weapons and equipment; contributions to the defense equitably distributed between our respective countries.

7. Support and expand the Atlantic Institute into a intellectual and spiritual center of the Atlantic Community.

Only through this effort of unity and integration that we can provide the scale required, economic assistance, as well as markets for developing countries.

Inspired by the achievements that our nations have done in the past, we can take a glorious destiny by joining forces present. "

The signatories are numerous. Still include the most prestigious names: Americans William L. Clayton, William H. Draper, Henry Ford II, Henry Kissinger, Robert P. Patterson, Elmo Roper, Clarence K. Streit, the British Sir Julian Huxley, Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands, the French Maurice Allais, Raymond Aron, Valery Giscard d'Estaing, Edmond Michelet, Guy Mollet, Paul Reynaud, Giulio Romano, Jacques Rueff, Maurice Schuman Canadians Lester Pearson and Paul Martin, the Belgian Paul Van Zeeland. (You will find all the names in the second document attached).

Conclusion:

As we mentioned above, if the cold war and the existence of a socialist camp were allowed to create Atlanticist NATO, and to sketch the first outlines of a common intercontinental is Only after the collapse of the Soviet empire that Europe and America have fully embraced the principles of federalism Atlantic. The two statements we have just studied in some ways prepared the ground. Today, facing the threat of "international terrorism" and the emergence of new powers such as China, India Russia or the West - led by the U.S. - is working on a common Euro-American full, without any citizen being informed by the media and the official press. Like the Multilateral Agreement on Investment (MAI), we absolutely must adopt the "strategy of Dracula," which consists in uncovering the existence and content of texts relating to this project since placed in full light, the vampire loses power and dies [2].

Notes:

[1] See our article on the Paris Declaration in January 1962: http://theorie-du-tout.blogspot.com/2010/12/la-declaration-de-paris-janvier-1962-la.html

[2] C. OF BRIE (1998), How the MAI was torn to pieces , Le Monde Diplomatique, March, p. 21.

Bounou Samy.

Attachments:

- Declaration of Atlantic Unity , Freedom & Union, October 1954:

http://streitcouncil.org/uploads/PDF/Declaration% 20of% 201954% 20Unity 20Atlantic% -% 20in% 20E% 20reprinted & U% 201954.pdf

- 242 NATO Leaders Sign Declaration of Atlantic Unity ,

Freedom & Union , January 1963:

ttp: / / streitcouncil.org/uploads/PDF/242 20NATO%%% 20Leaders 20Sign% 201963 -% 20F & ; U.doc.pdf

Pokemon Silver Shiny Pokemon Cheat

The Paris Declaration (January 1962): the first transatlantic declaration.

It's been 20 years since the unification process Atlantic was officially launched. On 22 November 1990 with the adoption of the Transatlantic Declaration by the Congress of the United States and the European Parliament, the Old and New World are committed to building a political union, economic and military. A few months after the disappearance of the Warsaw Pact, the Secretary of State for President George H. Bush, James Baker, said: "Our goal is a trans-Atlantic community from Vancouver to Vladivostok" (June 1991, Berlin) [1] .

In January 1962, months before the " Declaration of Interdependence " between Europe and America President Kennedy (July 4, 1962, Philadelphia) [2] a document preceded the Transatlantic Declaration: the declaration of Paris, the first step towards establishing a federation transatlantic democracies, and ultimately a world federation.

This statement is the result of the Convention of Atlantic nations of the Organization of the North Atlantic Treaty (NATO). The 90 delegates met in Paris citizens between 8 and January 20, 1962 had set the goal: build a true Atlantic Community ( "a true Atlantic Communauty " ) in a decade, the only way to ensure the survival and advancement of free men.

Preamble.

The preamble of the Declaration states that the Western world shares a collective legacy: that of a "great civilization" whose origins date back to "early achievements of the Middle East, beauty of classical Greece, the wise Roman jurisdiction, the spiritual strength of our traditional religions and humanism of the Renaissance. " The West is also a progressive world, based on modern science and the mastery of nature. His story was certainly marked by wars and conflicts of all kinds, however, common principles transcend his perpetual division: the rule of law, respect for individual rights, social justice, the duty of generosity. Western nations are thus, in the words of the Declaration, "a strong moral and cultural community " .

Recommendations.

The Atlantic Community must unite against the communist threat in the name of freedom and democracy. This union must be in the political, military, economic, moral and cultural. To accomplish this ambitious project, Atlantic Convention sets out a series of recommendations:

"Defining the principles on which Western civilization rests, and ensure compliance.

Create a High Council Standing at the highest political level, something essential to the Atlantic Community, to take concerted decisions for the whole Community [...].

Expand NATO parliamentary conference as part of a consultative assembly to enable it to review the work of all Atlantic institutions, and make recommendations.

Establish a High Court of Justice of the Atlantic to solve problems that may occur in treaties.

Harmonize strategies political, military and economic issues related to applying to the whole Community.

The North Atlantic Council should contribute to the development of a concerted policy of NATO, respecting the situation of extreme urgency with regard to the use of nuclear weapons .

The North Atlantic Council welcomed the development, progress, and expansion potential of the European Economic Community (EEC) and statements of President Kennedy. This indeed calls for establishing a commercial partnership between the EEC and the United States as a prelude to the establishment of a Community Economic Atlantic open to all nations of the free world.

Western nations, recognizing the right of all individuals to freedom, independence and the pursuit of happiness, must cooperate more extensively with developing countries in their economic programs. This cooperation be expressed by multilateral economic programs, an acceleration of investment and measures to double the volume and value of their exports, which involve special tariff reductions for their exports.

The Atlantic Community must take action to help improve their economies and to rebalance the economic potential of each.

Western nations, who witnessed the disappearance of national independence and human rights in Central and Eastern Europe, reaffirmed their belief that the problem of these nations under guardianship shall be resolved in accordance with the principles of individual liberty and national self-determination.

Create an Atlantic Council for youth, education and culture in order to develop exchange projects for young people, students or teachers - and thus to promote cultural and scientific cooperation on both sides of the Atlantic [3].

The NATO members committed to quickly establish a Special Commission Governmental intent to create the next two years a true Atlantic Community to meet the challenges political, military and economic time. "

issues of moral and cultural.

Atlantic Convention of NATO nations then defines the moral and spiritual principles of the Atlantic Community:

"The goals of political and economic institutions are the protection and promotion of rights, freedoms and duties, which allow each person to fulfill his spiritual vocation.

Freedom is inseparable from responsibility, implying recognition of the moral law that men, as individuals or as a community, must comply.

Freedom is inseparable from the duties of each vis-à-vis its neighbor, which implies an obligation to ensure to all people, little by little, the physical well-being and morality.

Freedom is inseparable from the tolerance, that is to say, the right to freely discuss all topics, as the principles of civilization are not exceeded.

There can be no freedom without diversity, the result of natural differences among people in all areas. But this diversity should not cause disunity. Conversely, retaining their common characteristics, it would become a force driving the peoples of Western civilization to the union.

Freedom is inseparable from the objective truth. We must therefore give the words the exact meaning they have in the Free World.

Member countries are invited to:

defend and promote the values and principles civilizational using education, various publications, teaching, radio, film and television.

observe in their conduct towards other nations ethics and values of civilization West and serve as an example, discord and disunity involved when abused.

defend these values and principles against the moral and intellectual subversion within the Community.

Trying to create an atmosphere conducive to mutual understanding among members of the Atlantic Community, seeking the maximum wealth from their diversity;

demonstrate to other nations that the only respect these values and de ces principes peut engendrer une civilisation technique dans le but d’améliorer le bien-être physique et moral de l’humanité.

Reconstruction de l’Acropole : décider que l’Acropole deviendra le symbole de notre culture et l’autel de notre Alliance, et appeler les gouvernements à réfléchir à la mise en oeuvre d'une telle mesure. »

Le moins qu’on puisse dire, c’est que le « monde libre » n’a rien à envier au monde socialiste en terme d’idéologie. Il est a noté, par ailleurs, que cette déclaration was made at the initiative of Federal Union Inc. and the Atlantic Union Committee , atlanto-globalization organizations conducted by Clarence Streit's Union Now author [4] .

If the Atlantic Community has not been implemented in a timely manner, it is clear that on the eve of 2011, the liners are about to win the game. With the creation of institutions like the Economic Council Trantatlantique, the Transatlantic Policy Council or the Transatlantic Assembly [5] , the avant-garde Paris declaration is about to materialize. But the Nemesis always ends up punishing the Hybris.

Notes:

[1] H. de Bresson (1991). "Mr. James Baker calls for the creation of a Euro-Atlantic community from Vancouver to Vladivostock" ", Le Monde, 20 June, p. 8.

[2] Speech by President Kennedy in Independence Hall in Philadelphia, Union in Western Europe, Assembly-Committee General Affairs: the political year in Europe, retrospective 1962, March 1963, pages 52 and 53.

[3] This recommendation recalls the Atlantis project, European program launched in 1995, which allows to study in the United States, benefiting from a scholarship. Show:

- The site of the Department of Education United States:

http://www2.ed.gov/programs/fipseec/index.html ;

- The site of Executive Agency Education, Audiovisual and Culture:

http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/extcoop/usa/2009/call_us_eu_2009.htm ;

- Le site de la commission européenne :

http://ec.europa.eu/education/eu-usa/doc1156_en.htm .

[4] « A daring try was made in 1962 when, on the initiative of the leaders of the Atlantic Union Committee and Federal Union, ninety leading citizens of NATO nations met in Paris in the Atlantic Convention. The outcome of the convention was the Declaration of Paris. They made recommendations including greater integration of NATO defense forces, establishment of an Atlantic High Court of Justice, further development of the Atlantic Assembly, and establishment of a Governmental Commission to draw up a charter for a true Atlantic Community. SEVERAL of the Less daring Were Implemented recommendations to Action Toward federation Did Not Develop "in http://streitcouncil.org/index.php?page=federal-union-inc

See our article on Clarence Streit: http://theorie-du-tout.blogspot.com/2010/11/clarence-kirshmann-streit-1896-1986.html

[5] We detail this in the institutional component of our chronic Transatlantic http://theorie-du-tout.blogspot.com/search/label/Chroniques 20Transatlantiques%% 20:% 20Institutions

Bounou Samy.

Attachment:

The Paris Declaration (English):

http://streitcouncil.org/uploads/PDF/Declaration% 20of% 201962% 20Paris -%% 20reprinted 20in% 20E & U% 20Feb% 201962.pdf

Juliet Cariaga Mpeg, Watchful Eye

[Blog] The U.S. and the EU will work to common regulations (AFP)

The TEC of Wikileaks, told AFP

How to create a link between Wikileaks notes and news in the world?

only a week ago, I rose against the "anti-Wikileaks" explaining that if the mainstream media had made their choices about the content they would serve the good people, it could nonetheless seek to Other themes, such as the Transatlantic Market. So I described in this post (1) the meeting between Congressman Froman Europeans and dignitaries, including Mr. De Gucht, Trade Commissioner, this is what he said in short:

Michael Froman (4) is an influential member in the United States, and this document (5) tells his visit to Brussels where he met the very high technocratic society, including Barroso (President of the Commission) Hedegaard (Climate), Barnier (Market), De Gucht (Commerce), and of course, Council President Herman Von Rompuy. They discuss in particular the TEC.

Froman supports with all his interlocutors " the interest of his Administration that the TRC gives real results. We are open to all ideas, he said, We can reform, restructure or even eliminate the TEC, according to what we identify as the best way to achieve the [secure] concrete progress [...] De Gucht sees the TEC as very important, especially in the context of the expansion of the Chinese economy and the significant trade deficit of the U.S. and the EU [... He] also noted that import duties have fallen, and non-tariff barriers will be the next challenge .

Another official said that some Vanheukelen " until today ' Today, the TEC has not been seen as extremely effective, but it is important to better "De Gucht and to recognize that" there are political problems concerning certain barriers nontariff [what a surprise ...]. It is important that the next meeting of the TEC produces concrete results [...] For that, he added, we must prepare carefully, outside light [out of the spotlight] .

Finally

" possible topics could include the TEC Doha, climate, issues related to China / Third World financial regulation .

Interesting: At the end of this paragraph transatlantic, it is reported that Froman was " to agree [...] that the important thing is to ensure that the next meeting will produce significant results to justify the presence of senior officials and stakeholders meet [stakeholders] . "The stakeholders, or stakeholders, Novlang, they are actually lobbyists and pressure groups (see Transatlantic Chronicle # 9 (6) on transatlantic institutions).

Well guess what, thanks to the wall to the top of the UPR (2) , a mine of information, I found this article from AFP (3) :

The United States and the European Union have pledged Friday to "reduce regulatory barriers " them, pledging to work towards the definition common regulations.

" Plus I act in the field of trade and the more I am convinced that to get rid of non-tariff barriers holds much value ," said EU Trade Commissioner, Karel De Gucht , following a meeting in Washington of the Transatlantic Economic Council (TEC).

The "non-tariff barriers " are all measures other than tariffs governing international trade, including technical regulations.

United States and the EU have agreed to work together to define common standards where possible for new technologies, electrical networks " smart" electric cars, etc..

The TEC was established in 2007 to foster " economic convergence" between the two sides of the Atlantic. Mr. De Gucht co-chair with Michael Froman, head of international economics at the National Security Council (NSC) of the United States.

The meeting resulted in agreement on " a set of regulatory principles ," a statement said.

Specifically, efforts must be undertaken on energy efficiency, health, food labeling, electric vehicles and infrastructure associated with them.

The TEC has also been the launch of a joint website against counterfeiting.

" This portal site designed to help European and American companies to exploit the resources in the law of intellectual property, as well as the tools developed on both sides Atlantic , "the statement said.

It was therefore an opportunity to link the news and what was unveiled Wikileaks, which I find beautiful in terms of symbols, in the sense where in the interview which took place in Brussels, we saw that really thought the protagonists, and what we see today in the filter press via AFP.

Gift : on the same page of the UPR, a supporter introduced this link is a video archive EuropeEnImage (taken from FR24 I believe): http://www.europeenimages.net//action- afficherArchives-category - film-982.html

Notes:

(1) The Theory of Everything, Seen on Wikileaks by Liior: http://theorie-du-tout.blogspot.com/2010/ 12/billet-vu-sur-wikileaks.html

(2) FaceBook page of the UPR: http://www.facebook.com/upr.francoisasselineau

(3) The Monde.fr, Trade: U.S. and EU want to work on common regulations , AFP: http://www.lemonde.fr/depeches/2010/12/17/commerce-les -usa-and-the-eu-want-a-work-of-regulation-communes_3214_236_44079391.html

Doxycyclilne Side Effects

[Ticket] A small development ...

The vote by MEPs of the FN
some questions, what answers would most likely
.

At the Like our fellow blogger and activist Johan Livernet today that Sunday annoying, it seems appropriate to do a little focus. Indeed, these days, a controversy erupted implausible about a vote of the FN at the European Parliament May 8, 2008. Being partly responsible for this controversy, I wanted make today an update (which does not bind the blog but just the author).

On 26 August 2010, I published the 4th chronic Transatlantic (1) , covering a resolution adopted May 8, 2008. Indeed, work undertaken for over six months by this blog on transatlantic federalism, both institutional and ideological level (see the wonderful article on Clarence Strait Samy (2) ), led us to paring a number of resolutions of the European Parliament (failing to consider, but it is possible that this will come, the U.S. perspective). The Resolution on the Transatlantic Economic Council (TEC or TEC for Transatlantic Economic Council) explains the views and objectives of the European Parliament on the transatlantic partnership and the integration of European and American markets.

In commenting on this post, I had the time to post two links, leading to the site http://www.votewatch.eu (web application that tracks the votes of Members parliament for a given document). In these statistics and records, appeared something incongruous embarrassing: The affirmative vote of the members FN, whose Marine Le Pen Bruno Gollnish, Carl Lang and others. At the time we had just laughed, but had none mentioned.

On December 4, 2010, Edgar, a dear friend to us and which tests are often in agreement with ours, takes the note of 26 August 2010 and summarized its readers ( 3) . He still included the information that the clan National supported this resolution. Several questions were asked in the comment as the information was surreal. It was therefore necessary to resume work, and look more official sources that VoteWatch.eu, work I have undertaken which I transcribed the result in the comment section.

So I indeed found the session PV (4) official site of the European Parliament, which was taken all voting members. It includes the bottom , and interesting documents containing extensive information about the votes made during this session. One we want is called "roll-call votes ( http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+PV+20080508+RES- RCV + DOC + PDF + V0 / / EN & language = EN ). On page 15, we arrive voting members, and we see that two votes were held (both links in the comments that I gave the ticket August 26, 2010). The first, named " am 1 " was approved by the FN, the second named " am 3 " of the same except that Mrs. Le Pen abstained.

So I concluded on 5 December on Edgar's blog:

" Indeed, one must be measured on Marine Le Pen. The two votes on the resolution of interest are described on page 15 and 16, in paragraphs 6 and 7 of the document. And we can see that if Mr. Gollnich also voted positively in the second vote, Marine Le Pen did it, not vote.

I hope you will forgive this "lightness" in this information, I am therefore obliged to qualify. Marine Le Pen has not fully passed this resolution. "

No longer on anything regarding this resolution, I decided also to question one hand Ms. Le Pen itself (by sending a message on December 5 speaks through its mailboxes EP and FN), and secondly, a friend who could help me with this lukewarm vote designations " am 1 "and" am 3 . "Indeed, if we know the votes on the amendments, we do not know the final vote on the resolution.

On 14 December the site ToutSaufSarozy.com
Edgar relays information in a "summary"

December 15, another colleague and blogger who takes Information on the site Infoguerilla.fr (5) under the title "The FN vote ... Globalist . "Curiously, it incorporates information another site, ToutSaufSarkozy. com (6) which gives some summary information on the transatlantic market (which in itself is already a small victory), and provides a link to VoteWatch voted on the first amendment (the object of scandal ... ).

On 15 December, resumed Infoguerilla information, and there
includes an update with some nuances

other words, some had read the article by Edgar, without taking a train station the discussion that took place in grades and hence the comment that we had finally put forward, and had shared information with a look somewhat biased. The same day, discussing with Lazy French Bastard, who is editor of the article Infoguerilla. Com, I insist, nonetheless, we do not forget the nuances outlined on the blog of Edgar, and he made the update on his article:

"Some small details of our friend Liior [...]. He questioned MLP-mail about this, without getting answers. Nevertheless, he said this information has to be tempered by the fact that "Never Marine Le Pen has passed a further resolution for the transatlantic market. It was the only time, and yet, it seems to have just voted for a kernel, and it has failed to resolve . "

On 16 December, the site I Like Your Style launches into an explanation
text.

Having received no response from Marine Le Pen (or team) or my friend regarding this issue right, it took them plunge. And here I came across an article on the site I Like Your Style corroborates prudence he must have with respect to this information (7) . The author explains:

"Only two amendments to the original 5 were subjected to a roll call vote. Once the text is original and amended since it was introduced by a large majority in parliament, it is likely there was no need to resort to a final vote nominal, but rather a show of hands faster. The resolution was finally adopted, but it is impossible to know who voted against the overall text. (It However, it can make a pretty good idea by comparing the different ratings nominal on the topic over the terms of office) "

There was therefore an incomplete picture of what happened that day. The author is careful to show the course of events, different votes, and types of votes.

We can also follow the advice given to us, and try to see what the trend of votes FN when speaking of the Transatlantic Partnership (so we can refer to my Quote me on the site Infoguerilla.fr ): The trend that emerges clearly from the National Bloc (and it's still logical) division is facing the transatlantic partnership some, and indifference to others (as manifested by their abstentions).

can access more details of the amendments voted on that day (highlighted by the article) and see the changes made by the First Amendment (the object of scandal, yet) are simply Common sense, in defense of supporters of the FN.

Some seem to believe today that our goal has been to "destabilize the FN" to "low political maneuvering," forgetting that our blog does not have this vocation, but simply wished to highlight some things we could think of being close to the truth. And we can not accuse us of lying (whether consciously or unconsciously), on any point whatsoever and at any time throughout this study.

whole thing would be a destabilization of the FN
? Or simply a fact
simple, clear and objective?

I was already four times this link ( http://eluspcfsassenage.over-blog.com/article-32229995.html ) leading to a blog communist who, like us, is disappointed the progress of the transatlantic market. It therefore gives the final vote by roll call of the resolution adopted March 26, 2009 (which we did a detailed summary on our transatlantic Chronicle # 11 (8) ), in which it is stated that the FN has voted against .

I never understood why they sent me this link, I put the question in case. I think the supporters of the FN that highlight this text believe that it overrides the text passed a year ago. If so, they will have to forget this idea, because it is false. The worst thing is that I feel like they are trying to make me "discover a scoop. Now I was the first to indicate that it is very unusual for the FN vote positively on such texts. Again, we can not be suspected of bad faith.

We will continue to share information sourced, detailed and verified, for such is the vocation of this blog (which, if it may be wrong on his conclusions that can and should be discussed, no mistake about its beginnings) even if it means hurting some, make some other crazy with joy, regardless of political sensitivities.

So I can proudly say everyone that if we find another gem on Ms. Le Pen or his sidekick Mr. Gollnish, we have much hesitation to go out as if they were Nicolas Sarkozy de Nagy-Bosca, Ségolène Royal or any other political figure: No:).

Notes:
(1) The Theory of Everything, Transatlantic Chronicles # 4 (May 8, 2008 resolution on CET) by Liior: http://theorie-du-tout.blogspot. com/2010/08/billet-chroniques-transatlantiques-4.html
(2) The Theory of Everything, Kirshmann Clarence Streit (1896-1986), father of federalism Transatlantic by Samy: http://theorie-du-tout.blogspot.com/2010/11/clarence-kirshmann-streit-1896-1986.html
(3) The Purloined Letter, The transatlantic market by Edgar: http://theorie-du-tout.blogspot.com/2010/11/clarence-kirshmann-streit-1896-1986.html
(4) Parliament website European PV session for May 8, 2008: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?language=FR&type=PV&reference=20080508&secondRef=TOC
(5) Infoguerilla.fr, The FN vote ... Globalist ! by Lazy French Bastard: http://infoguerilla.fr/?p=7180
(6) ToutSaufSarkozy.fr, Marine Le Pen and Golnisch want to believe calves "patriots" they struggle against globalization. In fact, they speed up: in their golden sinecure of the European Parliament, they voted for the "transatlantic market" in 2015 : http://www.toutsaufsarkozy.com/cc/article04/EkAkFkElpVZDvDMqmT. shtml
(7) I Like Your Style, The Rabbids to storm the parliament by Yoshikuni Hibiki: http://ilikeyourstyle.net/2010/12/16/les-lapins-cretins-a-lassaut-du-parlement-europeen/
(8) The Theory of Everything, Transatlantic Chronicle # 11 (Resolution 26 March 2009 on strengthening the transatlantic relationship) by Liior: http://theorie-du-tout.blogspot.com/2010/11/billet-chroniques-transatlantiques-11.html

South Park Streaming Fish Stick

[Ticket] Seen on Wikileaks ...

The latest salvo Wikileaks
projected on our screens over 250 000 notes
diplomatic State Department
American.


These revelations have sparked an outcry
world government.

It's fashion, the buzz, choose the word you want, but Wikileaks has actually been a small bomb dropped (intentionally?) On the establishment. The world is torn about whether Assange actually makes love to a Swedish woman without a condom.

On the Net, Wikileaks (at least the second salvo of Wikileaks) is perplexing. They ask many questions about the authenticity of the underground movement that aims to disseminate and archive files "Secret." I keep thinking to myself that this is indeed a citizen's movement transparent, can be handled at the notes that filter, but surely not a forger who we would send the wrong notes.

Wikileaks When some people think that suits the system and in particular the West in general, I prefer to think instead that the 1500 cable went out (of about 251,000 in all, we will be happy to discover ...), media who have access to these notes select.

Indeed, one can quite put words to Wikileaks what is already known about Iran and the Gulf region. Or we can make him talk about the transatlantic market and why no French political figures.

Since the "blogosphere" is quite divided on this point, I took upon myself to relate here a few snippets of what I've found through the site http://cablesearch.org / (which allows you to find the cables through keywords) and not to engage our partner blogger and beloved Sammy.

Moscovici and Holland meet the U.S. ambassador

In a document "confidential" dating from June 21, 2006 (at 8:08), the American ambassador (he is Mr. Craig Roberts Stapleton (1) ) in France described his meeting with PS. The title of the note is this: "The socialist leaders about Franco-American relations in France by dirrigée PS: Neither Blair nor Chirac " (2) .

Moscovici and Holland are two
Young Leaders Foundation
Franco-American, they were predisposed to
discuss domestic policy
with the Americans.

In the " Europe", we learn that Moscovici said that "PS administration would be far more pro-Europe President Chirac and Prime Minister de Villepin " [having ass pushed for TCE ...], and he and Holland have agreed to abandon the military sovereignty of France: " [They] see the need to use Europe to consolidate the defense industry and reduce costs through economies of scale. Holland noted sardonically that France was unable to sell his hunters its tanks or someone .

Moscovici also advocates a national parliament stronger when it comes to European affairs complaining that "the presidency concentrates too much power .

Holland is" agree with the agenda established by Chirac and Merkel to put Europe in 2007-2008 feet. "The two leaders agree that" Chirac has more credibility to offer though whether to advance the European project and refuse any two [...] the idea that the rejected constitution can be subject to a second referendum, or worse in their view, been through a parliamentary vote .

And then it's pretty cool, a great lesson in democracy from Pierre Moscovici: " [He] suggested that it might be possible to use the accession of Croatia introduce some institutional reforms that could be approved by the parliaments of member states . "For some, it's called a" dumpling .

Merkel and her love of the Transatlantic Economic Council (TEC)

This "secret" document dated January 29, 2008, wrote to the American embassy in Berlin and sent including CIA headquarters in Washington, is a note to explain the situation in Germany (3) . There is so much information, but the part that concerns us is entitled " Economics: Commitment to the TEC .

We learn that " Merkel has a high opinion of the Transatlantic Economic Council (TEC) between EU and USA - a centerpiece of his presidency of the European Union in 2007 - whose aim is to réduiire barriers regulatory trade and transatlantic investment. [... It] is concerned that the European Commission and future Presidencies EU (including France) could lose enthusiasm for the project. German officials are also worried that the new U.S. administration could derail what they consider a new instrument of the transatlantic economy very effective [Highly Successful] We should support our continued commitment to the TEC, and encourage the Germans to keep a leading role on this issue. "

Interesting no?

Froman MP's visit to Brussels

Michael Froman (4) a senior MP in the U.S., and this document (5) recounts his visit to Brussels where he met the very high technocratic society, including Barroso (President of the Commission) Hedegaard ( climate), Barnier (Market), De Gucht (Commerce), and of course the chairman, Herman Von Rompuy. They discuss in particular the TEC.

Froman supports with all his interlocutors " the interest of his Administration that the TRC gives real results. We are open to all ideas, he said, We can reform, restructure or even eliminate the TEC, according to what we identify as the best way to arrive at [secure] concrete progress [...] De Gucht sees the TEC as very important, especially in the context of the expansion of the Chinese economy and the significant trade deficit of the U.S. and the EU [... He] also noted that import duties have fallen, and non-tariff barriers will be the next challenge .

Another official said that some Vanheukelen " up Today, the TEC has not been seen as extremely effective, but it is important to better "De Gucht and to recognize that" there are political problems on some non-tariff barriers [what a surprise ...]. It is important that the next meeting of the TEC produces concrete results [...] For that, he added, we must prepare carefully, outside light [out of the spotlight].

Finally

" possible topics could include the TEC Doha, climate, problems related to China / Third World financial regulation .

Interesting : At the end of this paragraph transatlantic, it was reported that Froman was " to agree [...] that the important thing is to ensure that the next meeting will produce significant results to justify the presence officials and stakeholders meet [stakeholders]. " The stakeholders, or stakeholders, Novlang, they are actually lobbyists and pressure groups (see # 9 Transatlantic Chronicle (6) on transatlantic institutions).

Notes:
(1) Craig Stapleton Wikipedia: http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Craig_Roberts_Stapleton
(2) Cable 06PARIS4247 , "Socialist leaders about Franco-American relations in a France led by the PS: Neither Blair nor Chirac " http://213.251.145.96/cable / 2006/06/06PARIS4247.html
(3) Cable 08BERLIN122, "Welcome to Berlin " http://213.251.145.96/cable/2008/01/08BERLIN122.html
( 4) Michael Froman Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Froman
(5) Cable 10BRUSSELS183 " NSA Deputy Michael Froman visit to Brussels, 27/01/2010 " http://213.251.145.96/cable/2010/02/10BRUSSELS183.html
(6) The Theory of Everything," Transatlantic Chronicles # 9 transatlantic institutions " http://theorie-du-tout.blogspot.com/2010/09/billet-chroniques-transatlantiques-9.html

Stonecoat Gold Sporting Msrp

[Blog] Comparative statistics on terrorism in the USA

A little controversy, anyone?;)

The terrorist threat is virtually nonexistent

Gregor Seither - IES News Service - 07/12/2010

What are the chances of dying in a plane crash caused by a terrorist attack? According to Prof. . Paul Campos, a lawyer at the University of Colorado (Boulder, Co.) are 1 in 25 million, or almost close to zero.

In comparison, the chances of dying in a plane crash "standard" one in 9.2 million, according to data compiled by the database "OAG Aviation Database" in the United States. This means that, on average, an airplane pilot kills far more people than a terrorist. In the same

vein, the United States, you have 87 times more likely to die by drowning in a terrorist attack and 50 times more likely to die by being struck by lightning. As for the victims of police misconduct, they are 8 times more numerous than those terrorists, if one believes the figures for the 2004 National Safety Council . In the U.S., so the police kill eight times more people than do the terrorists - and these figures include deaths of September 11, 2001!

For Professor Campos the risk of a terrorist attack is so infinitesimal and its impact so insignificant a relative point of view, there is no rational justification to accept a violation of our civil liberties to a degree such as we see these last 10 years simply to try to avoid occurrence of a statistical anomaly.

a time when governments are investing billions of taxpayer dollars in surveillance technology more sophisticated, on behalf of our "protection", it is worth asking the question about what exactly is the reality This threat, against which it is claimed to protect us ... a like anti-missile batteries that the United States install in Europe to prevent an attack from Iran .... which has no missiles capable of reaching Europe!

Gregor Seither
IES News Service - 07/12/2010

---

only 25 Americans have died because of terrorism last year, less than car accidents, influenza, or dog bites

Zaid Jilani (*) Think Progress , August 10, 2010

One of the most common themes among the political issues post-September 11 is for politicians to campaign based on fear of terrorism. Candidates of all stripes are regularly referred to increasing threats from terrorists within the country and abroad as a reason to elect them to ensure our security.

While combating terrorism is important and fundamental to our national security strategy, the annual national report of the Secretary of State (impossible Hillary Clinton, current No. 4 Administration American equivalent of our Foreign Minister doubled certain responsibilities assigned to a prime minister) on terrorism, which was released last week shows that its importance as a subject of public interest factor is probably exaggerated. ; Warren P. Strobel of McClatchy report notes that the State Department has recorded worldwide, 25 American civilian victims of terrorism in 2009:

"There are only 25 non-combatant victims terrorism worldwide. (The definition of terrorism for the U.S. government excludes attacks on military personnel). While we do not have numbers available, there is no doubt that more U.S. citizens died abroad of car accidents, or intestinal fevers that of terrorism. "

Matt Yglesias Comparing the figures and believes that the feeling of Strobel on car accidents is correct. He writes: "26 Americans died in car accidents in Mexico City between 1 August 2009 and 1 January 2010, it is ; therefore proved to say that you are more likely to die overseas in a car accident than a terrorist attack. "

But it's not only car accidents abroad who are more deadly as terrorism. According to the Center for Infectious Disease Control, more than 13,000 Americans died of the common seasonal flu between January and April 2009, with "not less than 800 deaths per week in direct link with the flu This means that 32 times more Americans died of influenza in a single week during this period of 2009, that terrorism in one year complete.

Yet if Americans want to find a more dangerous threat to their lives than terrorism, they do not even need to leave their cars or communicate with their neighbor to catch the flu. All they have to do is watch their canine companions. Dogsbite.org, which brings together all the press reports concerning the victims of dog bites, has recorded 32 accidents involving dogs killing humans by the bite last year.

Again, the threat of terrorism is a serious matter of national security and must be treated as such. But given its death rate relatively low compared to other threats to humanity - the State Department report found that 58,142 people were killed by terrorist attacks worldwide in 2009, representing a tiny fraction of the 3 million children died of malnutrition and hunger easily treatable one year earlier - we must reconsider our priorities in more reasonable.

Zaid Jilani

Think Progress ; , August 10, 2010

Translation BlueRider for ReOpenNews

Turquoise Hat Band Conchos

[Ticket] Europeans and their institutions

The German Marshall Fund is an institute that aims
improving
understanding and dialogue between Europe and the United States. It edits

Transatlantic Trends each year.

With Sammy, I had access to all of a sudden a huge amount of information it will take me years to analyze. Among all this, I came across a PDF quite interesting on the site of the German Marshall Fund of the United States, an organization that need to be worrying about in a future column so it is important (1) .

I had seen these documents at my research on the transatlantic market. These are the Transatlantic Trends (Transatlantic Trends). They are edited by GMFUS regularly, and show the "trend".

It covers the year 2010 (2) and contains very interesting information! Particularly a section entitled " Crisis of the Euro, but not the EU "...

in advance, sorry for the translation ...

What do you think of the Euro?

" When we asked citizens if the Euro was a good or bad for the economy of their countries, the responses were mostly negative . With few exceptions, majorities in all eurozone countries responded that the euro had been a bad thing for their economy, including two homes economic power, France (60%) and Germany (53%) , Spain also (53%) and Portugal (52%). [...] Only the Dutch (52%) and Slovaks (64%), a majority say that the euro has been good for their economy. "

" The Euro is not backed out. The majority of English (83%) and Poles (53%) [...] think using the Euro would be bad for their economy. "

And the European Union?

" Europeans continue to believe that strong leadership of the European Union is desirable . When questioned specifically about their economy, the majority of Europeans (63%) think being a member of the European Union, the largest economy in the world, was a good thing for their country. This view was widespread in the Netherlands (75%), Poland (75%), Germany (69%), Portugal (69%), Slovakia (68%) and Spain (67%).

other hand, Bulgarians (40%) and Britons (45%) were less positive about the economic benefits of EU membership. But in France, where the majority were negative for the euro, the majority (61%) maintains that membership in the EU was good for their economy . At about the same percentage of Italians (62%) [were positive]. "

" More than half of European respondents (57%) felt that the economic difficulties should result in a greater commitment to build a stronger European Union . Italians (76%), Portuguese (70%), Bulgarians (66%), Spaniards (65%) and Slovaks (64%) were especially favorable to closer integration. On the other hand, the British Euro-skeptics generally (33%) were less in agreement with this view. "

opinions in favor of European Union membership and use of the Euro

Economic Decision Making?

"[...] A majority of European respondents (46%) also believe that to manage the current economic crisis, each national government should have primary responsibility . Nearly two-fifths of Europeans surveyed (39% ) responded that the EU should have the primary responsibility in managing the economic crisis current. Only in Germany, often described as the "locomotive of Europe", the majority (54%) believe the EU should have this responsibility and should take decisions on the economic .

This option was less popular in the United Kingdom (25%), Bulgaria (24%), Slovakia (22%), Romania (15%). The French were divided on the issue, with 47% preference for the national government, and 43% saying the EU should be in charge . "

And free trade (Free- Market)?

" The vast majority of Americans (90%) and Europeans (72%) believe that people are better in an economic free trade . Enthusiasm pro-free trade in British (81%) and Germans (78%) with almost rivals that of Americans. "

" support for free trade does not undermine the government. A large majority of respondents in the EU (78%) and Turkey (55%) continues to express the government has a role to play to regulate the market . The French (88%), Britain (86%) and Portugal (85%) were most inclined to support the role of government in market regulation. "

Opening

The document contains extensive information on other topics such as NATO, the role of China Turkey and the EU etc..

Read because it is interesting!

can find all the details of the study http://www.gmfus.org/trends/doc/2010_English_Top. pdf including the methodology used and the number of participants from each country. You can more easily consult directly and statistics "key" countries Country ( http://www.gmfus.org/trends/2010/countryprofiles.html ).

Notes:
(1) Website of the German Marshall Fund of United States: http://www.gmfus.org/about_gmf
(2) Transatlantic Trends 2010 (PDF): http://www.gmfus.org/trends/doc/2010_English_Key.pdf

Production Of Diazepam

Three of the "famous codes" are now available at the American online store Paris Air !