Sunday, January 30, 2011

Reserve Business Name And Maryland

[Blog] The European institutions would they put at the service of a self-fulfilling prophecy Transatlantic Union?

More than ever, trade between the various protagonists of the transatlantic agenda known density, intensity and regularity that we call to ask about their scope as much as their aim!
Limited until recently the major economic and trade issues, this agenda now covers the strategic and security issues!

is shown by both:
- the choice that has been entrusted to Great Britain, notably through the appointment of Baroness Ashton to the head of the Foreign Affairs Council and as High Representative for EU Foreign and Security Policy, the key political issues and the most sensitive diplomatic,
- the priority seems to have been given to meeting the objectives of a EU-NATO 'strengthened', as illustrated:
* party policy made by France to return to the integrated military structures of NATO, of almost simultaneously undertake a strategic alliance with the United Kingdom, after these two states have made a doctrinal alignment with national security on American literature, leading behind a European Union particularly docile
; * opening of Union bodies in charge of matters political and military personalities U.S. (see) and NATO (in particular, the commander of the ACT), as if it were obvious .... (See Issue 2 Pentagon in Brussels, Nicolas Gros Verheyde (Bruxelles2.eu) )
* interest and importance that cover not only the Council but also the European Commission, through confidential exchanges at the highest level with some individuals particularly influential in NATO as if it was already acting in step precursor "of a super Committee Euro-American (US / EU) responsible for" the general Western "and guarantees a" balanced cooperation " "... (Cf. Good Euro-American alliance! By Jean Dufourcq - new edition - ).
course, sharing principles, goals and core values, common history, shared culture, the strong interpenetration of European economies and U.S., the need to collectively pursue remedies for the ills caused by unbridled speculative capitalism, 'lawless', the shared concern of developing shared expectations of systemic risks and global threats to prevent major crises likely to permanently undermined the fragile and complex international balances in a world where new emerging powers, justify and legitimize such an intensification of the transatlantic relationship!
course, the fight against terrorism international fight against proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, the fight against piracy, support for democratic transitions around the world, searching for efficient and effective collective responses to monetary disturbances and financial markets, the difficulty Access to financial resources internationally mobile and many other common objectives in themselves justify a reconciliation strategies and military doctrines and diplomatic.
course, the de facto building new power poles, desired or suffered, adds to the need to strengthen political dialogue and strategic transatlantic.
But then, since that is what he is in daily acts of European institutions, why not say openly, publicly and democratically, as now, the European political project is nourish and support other project both political and policy: Building a Transatlantic Union embodying a power pole autonomous interdependence with other emerging poles of power! Or, build a Union Western, non-democratically identified this object as a result of self-fulfilling prophecy along the lines of what was openly called the wishes of his former French Prime Minister Edouard Balladur (see in particular in this regard http://www.france -amerique.com/articles/2008/09/10/edouard-balladur-plaide-a-washington-en-faveur-d-un-rapprochement-entre-l-europe-et-les-etats-unis.html ;)!
No democratic debate has preceded this major strategic move submarine!
It is true that people, citizens, consumers, taxpayers, weigh nothing against the elites who know ... since they are the elite! And people do soivent they blindly follow their elites here ... ?
peoples of the southern Mediterranean and the Arabian Peninsula are perhaps trying to show that things are not as simple matter!
If Joschka Fisher, Dany Cohn-Bendit, Guy Verhofstadt, and many other prominent political leaders working to advance the alternative project of the United States of Europe (particularly in the group Spinelli : http://www.spinelligroup.eu/fr ), the path is strewn with pitfalls, especially those that now stand in his way those who are responsible within the major institutions of the Union!
Alain Juppe, Minister of State in charge just in government defense issues, deploys lot of energy to the project of "Europe of Defence (misnomer so he takes ambiguities' no constructuves') definitely does not end up falling into this fight the 'earthen pot' against ' iron pot '(cf. Alain Juppe in Brussels: "I came to restore color to the European Defense," by Nicolas Gros Verheyde (Bruxelles2.eu) )!

Friday, January 28, 2011

Queensbury Economic Development Corporation

[Blog] Econosphere: Multinationals and Transatlantic Union (Bruno Poncelet)


Multinationals and Union Transatlantic

The United States and European Union have been working for years at a rapprochement. This transatlantic union is the result of a fundamental change in power relations: multinationals are taking over. And we will see, the market settles not confined solely to the economic dimension.
Poncelet Bruno, Ricardo Cherenti
Article online since October 25, 2010











words that deceive

Take the word "free trade": we often associate the idea of freedom, as if to create very large commercial areas favored the freedom of everyone. The reality is quite different. Indeed, a market will never arises spontaneously. It needs laws, constraints and institutions to function.
Thus, markets can not function without laws to set standards of production techniques (eg compliance of electrical equipment with electrical outlets), the necessary qualifications to carry out certain professions (we think of doctors) or establish minimum security standards. More importantly, without specific legislation, private property would have no reality (as reflected in the lives of many societies and the extent of collective forms of ownership since the beginning of mankind). Therefore, political negotiations are still needed to expand into new areas laws on private property (as is the case now with ACTA draft or Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement ) 1.
For laws are enforced and respected, they require institutions, including law enforcement, as courts or police. To take the example of ACTA, one of the challenges is to strengthen controls relating to hacking, to enable customs officers to search laptops, MP3 or mobile phone to search for files downloaded illegally.
Finally, as evidenced by the creation of the European Common Market, the principle of free competition applied over a wide geographical scale allows some businesses to grow at the expense of smaller private firms.

Multinationals

Today, some corporations are so big, they compete with the United States. Some examples: Toyota has a financial strength 2 equivalent to the State of Israel, the oil company Chevron is richer than Portugal, while firms Walt-Mart, Exxon Mobile and Royal Dutch / Shell each brew more money than countries such Argentina, Iran, Greece and Denmark.
Like any organization, multinationals produce their own standards: they govern the lives of their branches and their employees, for example by imposing their personal stock phrases, smiles standardized or uniform haircuts 3.
Logically, the right of states prevails over that of private firms in Belgium, a multinational can not make children work because the law prohibits it. Where ethical and legal constraints do not exist, develop by multinationals against the logic of predation exceptional: inhumane working conditions (including children), destruction and looting of natural resources, and even resort to murder against union leaders and environmentalists 4.
The finding is clear: where the political power do not take their head, multinational corporations impose their dictates.
In our rich, traditional social-democratic states have been able to counterbalance any time to these multinationals. But things change. In presenting the company values at the heart of the company (productivity, competitiveness, profitability, ...), Neoliberalism has allowed businessmen to gain influence and increase complicity in the political world. It also allowed the mergers and acquisitions, giving birth to gigantic companies.
And if until now the company was adapting to national standards, now it is up to public standards to adapt to the needs of large enterprises. In this logic, several strategic objectives are pursued. Observe them.

What do multinationals?

A Global Market! We said the market for its existence needs standards. As states are sovereign, the world is like (for CEOs) to multiple distinct legal areas that hinder the expansive logic of the multinationals. Why they want to establish global market-friendly laws.
A stable market and secure! A market is not based solely on market laws. It also requires political stability and law enforcement agencies.
In fact, what investor would risk his assets in a volatile region, beset by wars or violence? A fortiori when these investments totaled, such as multinationals, in millions or billions of dollars?
Similarly, union protests, environmentalists, citizens, etc.. are a danger to the expansion of commercial companies eager for maximum profitability.
therefore unify the work of police, army, customs, courts and all the forces of control "public" on a transnational scale is also a priority for multinationals.

The Transatlantic Policy Network (TPN)

To achieve these objectives and adapt the world to their demands, the multinationals have set up different strategies. In our society, this means including the formation of alliances between political elites and international business community. This collusion is through the creation of many lobby groups, which we use here one of the most emblematic: the Transatlantic Policy Network (TPN), or Transatlantic Governance Network.
Compared to the majority of existing lobbies that are pushing outside the sphere policy, the NPR is constituted from the outset to influence from inside the political world.
It is characterized by the following:
it brings together politicians, businessmen and leading academics;
it meets U.S. and European elites who aim to bring together, at all levels, United States and the European Union.
From its birth in 1992, the NPR includes among its members 40 MEPs, 18 U.S. senators and CEOs representing "twenty of the largest global companies' 5. He also enjoys strong institutional support, ranging from St. Antony College, Oxford at the European Round Table of Industrialists, the Aspen Institute of Italy at the European Institute in Washington, the German Marshall Fund of the United States to European Commission. Honorary Presidents of the TPN are then the European side, Peter Sutherland (Chairman of the GATT) and the U.S. side, Ambassador Robert Strauss.
What is TPN? Create a Transatlantic Union between the U.S. and the European Union, to profoundly transform our lives, our laws and our institutions. Commercial Requirements
TPN
"The transatlantic market is the anchor of the global economy" 6. This sentence sums up the marketing strategy of TPN.
The first target set in 1994, is to create a common market and competition between the U.S. and the EU. Presented as a necessity by the TPN, the transatlantic market will allow the largest U.S. and European companies to grow further. In this way, they hope to compete with their counterparts from emerging countries, phagocytose smaller companies (merger, acquisition, subcontracting), and gain more influence over the states.
Once reached the transatlantic market, the second objective will be to extend its operating rules worldwide. Overall, European and American markets represent approximately 60% of world trade 7. TPN relies on this advantage to impose quantitative (via transatlantic governance) performance standards uniform across the globe.

Consequences Under the guise of establishing a "free market" (One word we have called misleading), it is actually strengthened at all levels of freedom for large corporations to circumscribe the freedom of everyone:
forced to work harder for less money, the worker will, increasingly, accept the conditions and working hours entirely dependent on business needs 8;
reduced to the level of emergency, public service will become commercial, social security to fade profit private insurance while abandoning its mechanisms of redistribution of wealth;
subject to compete more and more rough and uneven, SMEs suffer the pressures of transnational firms, some SMEs will disappear (acquisition or bankruptcy), others will be franchised or sub-contractors, and only a minority will benefit from the system;
d Other examples could apply to consumers, the environment, finance, culture, etc..

The influence of TPN

By 1994, this proposed transatlantic market has been defined by the TPN who wrote: "These ideas must now be injected directly policies in the arteries of the European Union over the next year. TPN members will take care of Europe " 9.
A year later, the United States and the European Union adopted the New Transatlantic Agenda. On the menu of this agenda: the creation of a free trade transatlantic! But also (another vow blown by the TPN) the creation of the Transatlantic Dialogue, in which business will act as principal adviser 10. Following
voltages USA / EU (trade disputes to WTO 11, war in Iraq ...), The project will be frozen for a while. And it was under the influence of major powers that the two TPN will revive, around 2005, negotiations on the transatlantic market. By creating common institutions such as the Transatlantic Economic Council (TEC) 12 , politicians have stepped up agreements to standardize trading rules, and now hope to achieve transatlantic market by 2015.

security requirements

TPN TPN requirements are not limited to economic and social regulations. They also cover all repressive institutions empowered to enforce standards
market ... If you want to create a transatlantic market, it is indeed necessary to establish police structures, criminal and judicial co-ordinate and cooperate with one continent to another. Furthermore, freedom of large companies paying the price of inequality increasingly strong control populations and anticipate the protests may be capital. Finally, access to raw materials mobilizes logical diplomatic and military nature to sustain the transatlantic market.
By 1994, the NPR proposes to create a safe space and transatlantic military. But Europe at that time had virtually no criminal jurisdiction, judicial or military. These are the states that are filled. That is why the security requirements of TPN are mainly:
to fill the European Union a legitimate sovereignty in these skill areas;
to give the EU a political role on the international scene;
to strengthen NATO's role in the transatlantic partnership.

The influence of TPN

Adopted in 1997, the Treaty of Amsterdam opened the way for the creation of a secure and common criminal on a European scale. Following a series of institutions were born or grew up (Europol, CEPOL, Eurojust, Frontex 13), while many agreements have emerged. Among the logic in place, personal data collection routine is to meet people. Thus, the recent transition to biometric passports designed to encode a growing number of personal data (including fingerprints) for use by any police force European or American ....
However, to achieve an area transatlantic security, it lacked the EU a major legislative tool: legal personality and the right to conduct foreign policy on behalf of its member countries. This obstacle has been lifted since the adoption of the Treaty of Lisbon (on 1 December 2009), which will allow the multiplication of transatlantic security arrangements - such as those entered into force on 1 February:
Legal Assistance provides for transatlantic the establishment of joint police teams (American and European) or the use of videoconferencing to interview under oath of witnesses and experts;
extradition transatlantic law greatly facilitates the free movement of detainees and suspects in the European Union to the United States (except Should the death penalty could be applied).

Consequences Under the guise of protecting people, it is practical at all levels to strengthen the coercive power of states and supranational structures. In 2006, the European Union has adopted a directive authorizing any Learn about our telecommunications: the people we call, for example, or the websites we visit 14. Such measures are justified by the fight against terrorism. The problem is that no objective criteria does not define what a terrorist act: only the author's intent is crucial. Thus, according to European legislation, " unduly compelling a Government or international organization to do or abstain from doing any act " is potentially a terrorist act. It could aim for a National strike action or any citizen (residents, environmentalists) temporarily blocking an airport. The arbitrariness is even larger than the charge of terrorism can also be done on the basis of mere membership in a group 15.
But repression is not just transatlantic societies. Indeed, recent discussions aimed at reforming the NATO plan explicitly incorporate the concept of preventive war (striking first to prevent a threat is only potential) 16. Again, the end seems to justify the means.

Conclusions

Done in the name of globalization happy Transatlantic Union transforms the world according to the needs of multinational companies seeking to strengthen their grip on all aspects of our lives. With their friendship networks and their ideological connivance with politicians and intellectuals, the international business community guiding the progress of European integration in order to establish a transatlantic governance tailored to increase economic competition, population monitoring, and suppression of protesters.
Freedom to pay market prices regressions Social, ecological destruction, and democratic setbacks inquiétants.Pour very much, as evidenced also the action of TPN, it is not inevitable: there is enormous human wills to establish institutions, transforming laws, and establishing a transatlantic partnership still further. For now, only a business-political elite is in control.
But the world is constantly changing. To us, citizens, community activists, trade unionists, environmentalists, turn the tide. Tomorrow depends on what we do today. And it is time to mobilize. For lack of resistance collective, it is not only our lives are in danger, it is also (and especially) democracy.
1 The latest version of the text currently being negotiated is located at the following address: http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2010/october/tradoc_146699.pdf . The emphasis on intellectual property rights by the European Union is exposed here: http://ec.europa.eu/trade/creating-opportunities/trade-topics/intellectual-property/index_en.htm .
2 Here are comparing turnover of multinational companies (source: Fortune magazine) and the national GDP (source: IMF). On this subject see the Gresea Echos No. 62, pp. 4-5.
3 See in this documentary following: Attention danger work (Pierre Carles of - Stéphane Goxe - Christophe Coello ) and The Killing work of Jean-Robert Viallet. Internet links: http://atheles.org/cpproductions/dvd/attentiondangertravail/index.html ) http://www.film-documentaire.fr/Mise_a_mort_du_travail.html, film, 25568
4 Coca-Cola uses such practices (see: http:/ / killercoke.org / ). But it is not the only multinational to do so, as stated in his book William Bourdon "Confronting Crimes of the market: what weapons legal for citizens?" , Editions The discovery, Paris, 2010.
5 The exact list of multinational members is available on the site TPN: http://www.tpnonline.org/business.html (you can also find the membership policies).
6 TPN Completing the Transatlantic Market , May 2008, p. 7. Available at the following address: http://www.tpnonline.org/pdf/TPN 20Completing% 20the% 20Market% 20Transatlantic%% 20 -% 20Annual% 20Report.pdf 20seconds%
7 All claims are found in the document TPN: "Toward Transatlantic Partnership - A European Strategy" , November 1994, http://www.tpnonline.org/Archive/european.pdf . The figure for the weight of the two transatlantic partners in global trade is derived from Resolution P6_TA (2008) 0192 of the European Parliament, Article 32.
8 This adaptation project work schedules according to business needs is particularly championed by the European Commission, which would legislate in this direction. See http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:52010DC0106:FR:HTML .
9 TPN "Toward Transatlantic Partnership - A European Strategy ", November 1994, p.22.
10 In his 1998 paper quoted above ( "Completing the Transatlantic Market ", May 2008, p.9), recognizes the TPN (proudly!) That " was involved in the creation of the New Transatlantic Agenda, the Transatlantic Business Dialogue (TABD), the Transatlantic Economic Partnership and the Transatlantic Economic Council (TEC).
11 The WTO is the World Trade Organization.
12 For more information on this subject, read our previous articles: Transatlantic "Europe, a company Transatlantic ( http://www.econospheres.be/spip. php? article 21) and "Transatlanticism cons humanism" ( http://www.econospheres.be/spip.php?article94 ).
13 Respectively the European Police Office, the European Police College, the Judicial Cooperation Unit of the EU and the Agency For the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders.
14 In Belgium, the text is not yet effective, because it must first be approved by Parliament, which faces a challenge that citizens may find the following address: http://bewaarjeprivacy.be/fr
15 For details on these anti-democratic logic, see Jean-Claude Paye, "The End of the Rule of Law: The Struggle terrorism, state of exception dictatorship ", Editions La Dispute, Paris, 2004.
16 Cfr. http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natolive/official_texts_63654.htm , especially the part Moving Toward NATO 2020 - Protecting Against Unconventional Threats.

Thursday, January 27, 2011

Silver Cinemas Macomb Mall Roseville Mi

[Ticket] Freedom of expression in a "cultural café" Marseille ...

It is not a blog here? So I'll use it for the first time as 80% of people use, like a public diary (inept concept). I will first tell you what made me angry today.

It's been long enough that I want, when I have time, a conference room in order to bring an individual whose tests are dear to me (Oh yes, return to the first parenthesis of the text, you'll find that I am a real poet!), François Asselineau, president of the People's Republican Union, and whose lectures are on this blog (see text), and I've seen twice "live "which left me whenever mouth-bay by her sense of detail and discourse.

I started by asking the room that had hosted the first time, January 7, 2010 in Marseilles, the film The Prado. The management has changed, I simply explained that it was no more political conferences. Why not, it can defend itself. I suffered further rejection of this type, and it does not bother me.

Two weeks ago, I wrote an email to a cafe 'cultural' one friend advised me to contact. I will not name him but he is street Lodi (in 6th). Here are the details of the mail I've sent them:
Dear, Hello,

We would like to organize a conference historico-politico-economic
(that's a lot of words) by Francis M. Asselineau,
Inspector General of Finance, which travels throughout France
to deliver a message: Its conferences are the EU
European and institutions under their real days.

You can find his lectures on YouTube and Dailymotion.

We want to know what he can do, the ability
host your premises.

Thanks in advance,

Sincerely,

This is what they said right after "text":
mia is what you can get a good response stp
c to have them with us
Misery of misunderstanding of the computer. Not properly manage his fucking mail. A point a less.

so I answered simply and politely:
Dear

Excuse me, I received this email in response (it certainly does me not addressed), but I have not heard about our request of 18 January.

Sincerely,
And that's where it gets funny. Sorry for the details past before that ... Today I was finally answered:
Hello,

sorry for the previous mail, that you were not actually intended.
The coffee culture has a conference room in the basement, which seats about fifty people seated.
However, we noted the positions of Mr. Asselineau and the Republican People's Union, and I must admit that our opinions differ on the European issue.
After consulting the board, so we prefer to give a negative result to your request.
However, if a debate with another person having a different opinion you seem possible we would be happy to consider it.

Sincerely,
So basically, the debate among them is to talk with people who agree with them. One point less. But what's more, they explain simply and naively, that basically, if someone has a different opinion, then I could bring. A cultural café in Marseille.

soon.

Monday, January 24, 2011

150l050 Belt Cad Drawings

The purpose of NATO is the federal union, according to Nelson Rockefeller (November 1964).


On 20 November 1964 Federal Union Inc. celebrated its 25th anniversary. George V. Allen, the chairman of the executive committee was organized for the occasion a great banquet in the ballroom of the Warwick Hotel in Philadelphia. Nelson A. Rockefeller, Mr. and Mrs. Benjamin Baker, Mr. and Mrs. Roy Chiffa, and Clarence K. Streit and his wife, Joan, attended. Streit, the "Great Manitou" Federal Union of Inc., had invited the Governor of the State of New York to deliver a speech on the state of transatlantic relations 25 years after the founding of the movement.

By way of introduction, author Union Now held to recall that the idea was shared Transatlanticism atop the American state. It was indeed sent to Governor Rockefeller as follows: "you have differing views with Mr. Nixon - but not on the unification Atlantic. You have different views with former President Kennedy - but not on the unification Atlantic [...]. You sometimes, I think, different views with General Eisenhower - but not on the unification Atlantic [...]. And you have, I understood, opinions different from those of Senator Goldwater - But not on the Atlantic unity ". Regarding this policy, but rather the one-party rule [1] ...
Referring also to the fact that Benjamin Franklin was able to consolidate the thirteen colonies in 35 years, Clarence Streit said it was time to unite the democracies of the North Atlantic, after twenty-five years of activism. Following these considerations on American history, he gave the floor to Nelson Rockefeller.

The Republican governor at first made the following observation: after a half-century chaos, marked by two "great civil war," the West still suffers from its disunity, even as the Eastern bloc is increasingly threatening. However, the increasing interdependence between states no longer isolationism.
The situation is hardly new. Western nations are facing the same problems as the thirteen colonies of old. After the War of Independence against George III and the Treaty of Paris in September 1783, the colonies were sovereign but now divided, plagued by multiple conflicts. On 17 September 1787, despite the currency turmoil, the tariff wars, military hostility between the States - in short, a near civil war - the Federal Constitution of the United States was accepted by the Convention met in Philadelphia. Two years later, after much debate, the American Union was finally beginning to function and prosper, becoming the first world power in the twentieth century.
Rockefeller believes that in the 1960s, the nations of the "free world", particularly members of NATO, through the same difficulties as the Americans in 1787. As fascism and Nazism were eradicated at the end of the war, "the beautiful idea of Europe" finally germinated, as the Atlantic alliance had been created, the national clivaqes have increased. However, the increase in world population, scientific revolutions, social upheavals, the nuclear threat posed by communist world on the "free world" make urgent creation of a federal union between the democracies of the North Atlantic . The speaker criticizes the passage of France's General de Gaulle and argues that Europe must come closer to the United States within the Atlantic alliance.
Western nations, sharing the same worldview, and the state of human nature, must commit to building a unique political structure. What the founding fathers of the American Union have been on a continental scale, the federalists of the twentieth century must do so on an intercontinental scale.

intercontinental federation, built from NATO, would respect the identity peoples and strengthen democratic governance and human dignity. "It would provide a framework for accelerating the movement of goods, money, ideas and solve agricultural problems, that of labor, unemployment, and equal opportunities for ethnic minorities ". It would inspire other nations, particularly those in the eastern bloc, which will find a "haven of peace within the Union" . It would provide a solution to disputes over nuclear weapons. Finally, it would form the political, economic and most powerful military on the planet, and not fear more international communism.

To implement this project Frankenstein, our sorcerer's apprentice of globalism proposes organizing a convention attended by delegates to set a timetable for completing the federal union. Republican Congressman Paul Findley was also an advocate of Transatlanticism. Democratic side, John F. Kennedy, President Johnson, Vice President Humphrey, former Senator Kefauver defended the principles of Union Now. The time of isolationism is gone now.
Rockefeller concludes his lecture by suggesting ways of establishing "union Atlantic within a federal structure" : Based on the EEC to the economy, and NATO for defense and foreign affairs. It is just a suggestion, other combinations are possible. In all cases, it is America that leads the way ...
Conclusion:

In 2002 the United States and in France in 2003, David Rockefeller's brother Nelson, has published his memoirs. In Chapter 27, the founder of the Trilateral Commission we made this confession spectacular "for over a century, ideological extremists on both sides of the political grab the much talked about incidents in the newspapers, such as my encounter with Castro to blame the Rockefeller family, the inordinate influence they claim we have on the political and economic institutions of the United States. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the interests of major U.S. and they represent my family and me as "internationalists" and they are going to pretend that we conspire with other capitalists in the world to build a political structure and more integrated global economy - one world, if you want. If this is what I am accused, I plead guilty and I'm proud " [2] . The old banker was able to better express the purpose of Transatlanticism promoted by his brother, and the role of the Rockefeller dynasty in the new world order. The transatlantic union to be completed in 2015, the 2010s may be decisive for the future of the world.

Notes:

[1] added that:
- Harry S. Truman, President of the United States from 1945 to 1953, was one of the signers of the Declaration of Atlantic Unity, whose purpose was to strengthen NATO in order to outline the federal union in transatlantic http: / / theorie-du-tout.blogspot.com/2010/12/deux-declarations-pour-lunite.html
- Lyndon Johnson, president of the United States from 1963 to 1969, said: "The United States IS resolved to do Everything in its powers - and I Emphasize The Word Everything - to Enhance The strength and unity of the North Atlantic community "in http://streitcouncil.org/uploads/PDF/F&U- 20Rockefeller%%% 20Proposes 20Immediate 20Convention%%% 20to% 20Declate 20NATO 20Goal%% 20Is% 20Federal% 20Union . pdf
- January 17, 1986, Ronald Reagan sent a letter to Clarence Streit on the occasion of his 90th and last birthday. The U.S. president praised his work and his action in http://streitcouncil.org/uploads/PDF/Reagan_on_Streit.pdf

[2] David Rockefeller, Memoirs , Paris, Editions de Fallois , 2006, p. 475.

Attachment:

Rockefeller Proposes Immediate Convention To
NATO Declares Goal Is Federal Union,
Freedom & Union, December 1964:

Wednesday, January 19, 2011

Fire Sprinkler Head Covers

The showcase of 2011 Valentine


Here is the showcase for the occasion of Valentine's Day recess in the red honor! the perfect place for your gift!





Saturday, January 15, 2011

Advanced Respiratory Technologies, Inc.

End of the campaign Gold Night

The campaign
Gold Night, which has more than one happy is finished yet.

Not being the first time that this promotion offers Depositfiles, hopefully a new campaign in the future.

For those interested in different hostings as Hotfile, Megaupload, Depositfiles, Rapidshare ..., a blog is available at the following address: http://hebergement-de- fichiers.blogspot.com

If the campaign were to resume, the information will be posted on both blogs.

Wednesday, January 12, 2011

Diaper Disposal Calgary

round of public meetings exceptional in the south of France from 17 to 22 January 2011

learn-french-in-provence-11 To start the new year 2011 Francis ASSELINEAU will be present in the south of France, all week, from January 17 to 22 2011.Au program: meetings with the membership, conferences, debates, speeches to students and radio show!
This remarkable program is also the sign of the ever growing development of the UPR and the desire to offer real answers to the expectations of the French. The foresight of his ideas, the quality of its analysis and proposals as well as its strategic vision for France seem to be rallying more and more people.
You will find below the detailed program This exceptional week.


Monday, January 17 (12:30 to 2:00 p.m.) - Montpellier Divergence FM and internet radio
debate between Francis Asselineau, Jean-Claude Gayssot and Julien Devèze.
An exciting coming debate between the former communist minister (left),
national secretary of the New Center (right, presidential majority)
and the president of the Republican People's Union (UPR) ( over-the left-right).
Divergence FM, the radio station 100% Free Montpellier
93.9 FM and on internet: http://divergence-fm.org/player/

Monday, January 17 at Montpellier (15h30 - 17h00)
Conference "impasses of Europe" (open to students of the School South Pole)
Abstract: This conference - not open to the public - dissects a series of major problems facing the European construction problems that are systematically ignored in the media and circles
reflection, but can only lead to the final explosion of the building.
South Pole School - School students in preparatory classes at Sciences Po and journalism schools.
Address: 2 Rue Saint Como - Montpellier

Tuesday, January 18 at Narbonne (19h - 22h00)
Conference-debate "Out of the euro: manual " Abstract: What supranational currencies have existed before the euro? What happened to them? What is the main characteristic of a currency? Why the Bible written there are over 2000 years and the Nobel Prize in Economics they come to similar conclusions about what a currency? What are the 2 main reasons that the euro will explode sooner or later? How to legally get out of the euro? How to get out technically? What concrete proposals?
Narbonne, 8 avenue des Pyrénées, Free Admission Restaurants Botafogo

Wednesday, January 19 Avignon (7:30 p.m. to 10:00 p.m.)
Conference-debate: "Who governs France and Europe?"

Summary: Who invented the European construction? What is the trick with which flew the French for their freedom? Why Europe is it necessarily more inefficient and dictatorial? Why Europe can not it be done differently? De Gaulle was really for Europe? The Franco-German motor is he? Who are the lobbyists who claim to speak on behalf of the European people? Who are these commissioners European stronger than our ministers? Why the curricula of all political parties did they become inapplicable? Why your ballot is not there anything more? This conference dismantles the U.S. strategy vis-à-vis Europe since the end of the Second World War and exposes, with a clarity rarely equaled, the most critical issues facing today in France.
hall of the Hotel de Ville, Place de l'Horloge, Avignon
Free admission

Thursday, January 20 at Avignon / Montfavet (7:30 p.m. to 10:00 p.m.)
Conference-debate "Should REALLY be afraid to leave the Euro?"
Summary: While the problems posed by the euro continue to and worse than most experts anticipate the next explosion, major intimidation are back, those same people who had promised the French, 19 years ago that the euro would bring their growth, prosperity and full employment , are assured now that out of the euro would cause the Apocalypse. This conference exposes this new maneuver by providing information and original dramatic: there is indeed a people in Europe who have already been made that shot of the Apocalypse, and yet stood firm: that he had been told and that he is there happened? The comparison with the French case can fully grasp the issues and understand why the French must stand firm and get out of the euro as soon as possible.
Avignon / Montfavet, 3760 Route de Marseille, Restaurant "The terrace of Eden"
(Next to the Avignon airport, 5 minutes Agroparc, Fontcouverte MIN)
Easy parking on site
Entrance fee: 3 euros

Friday, January 21 in Saint-Julien-de-Peyrolas (Gard) (7:15 p.m. to 10:30 p.m.)
Conference-debate "If we were leaving Europe! "
Abstract: For many decades that we are told that European integration is the future of France, and that future is both highly desirable and absolutely inevitable. Yet Europe is more building and less promises which he had been accompanied by true: the countries of Europe continue tumbling down in the hierarchy of powers and the United States now reign supreme on the continent and a large part of the planet. But, as always, history is full of trickery: the political edifice, which was launched 60 years ago, is now rotten and major problems to condemn the dislocation. What would happen if we left Europe?
Festival Hall of the City (village center, parking, schools)
Free admission

Saturday, January 22 in Montpellier (14h00-17h00)
Conference "Why is Europe as it is?"
Summary: From the extreme right to extreme left, through all political, it is not a single French political movement, besides the UPR, which dares to declare against the very principle of European construction. But on the political spectrum, there is not one leader who déclarefavorable in Europe as it exists. In sum, all French politicians to declare the principle of European and cons as which we find it unfolds. But really, why is Europe as it is? And how is it that no politician never ask this question publicly any beast?
Université Paul Valéry Montpellier 3, Route de Mende
Free and open to all.